To get an overview of them you have to reverse the revisions passed to git log for (hopefully) obvious reasons.Īs usual, it's essential to educate yourself to understand the underlying concepts before starting to use a tool. Note that your local branch might also have commits which the matching remote branch does not contain (yet). But that is especially broken when the current local branch is also master. That is the fetch part: it stores the remote history from the updated origin/master. While it might make sense to store what you want to pull.
GIT FETCH ORIGIN FREE
You're free to customize the output of git log as you see fit as it supports a whole lot of options affecting it. Regarding the origin of this patch, follow the discussion there. The fetch and push protocols are not designed to prevent one side from stealing data from the other repository that was not intended to be shared.
GIT FETCH ORIGIN MANUAL
Also see the examples in the git-log manual page If you tried a pull which resulted in complex conflicts and would want to start over, you can recover with git reset. git pull on the other hand does that AND brings (copy) those changes from the remote repository. It's more like just checking to see if there are any changes available). So assume origin has branches master, featureX and featureY. git fetch is the command that tells your local git to retrieve the latest meta-data info from the original (yet doesn't do any file transferring.
Those branches are locally stored asSee the "gitrevisions" manual page for more info, especially the "Specifying ranges" part. 4 Answers Sorted by: 56 When you fetch a remote repository, say origin, you will get remote branches for each branch that exists on that remote repository. Or, alternatively git log master.origin/master Then, clone the Git remote repository to the local repository and run the git fetch origin command to fetch the remote branches. Which means «all commits reachable from "origin/master" which do not include commits reachable from "master"» So, after you fetched, to see what remote "master" has compared to your local "master", you ask Git to show you exactly this: git log origin/master ^master
That is, your local "master" branch follows "origin/master" etc. Now, the usual Git setup is that (some of) your local branches follow certain remote branches (usually same-named). You could see them in the output of git branch -a (notice "-a"). Say, for the remote named "origin" which contain branches named "master" and "feature", running git fetch remote will result in the remote-tracking branches named "origin/master" and "origin/feature" being updated (or created, if they're not exist). Git fetch origin by default fetches everything from the remote named "origin" and updates (or creates) the so-called "remote-tracking branches" for that remote.
0 kommentar(er)
